Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Land of Make-Believe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Seventh Sojourn. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:29, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Land of Make-Believe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article uncited and subject seems unnotable as merely an album track.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 23:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - a lack of citations is not a reason for deletion. Instead, the community should be encouraged to expand the article through the use of an edit tag, which I will add. There should be a good faith attempt to find sources before nominating an article for deletion because it has no sources. See WP:DEMOLISH and related articles. Also, the nominator needs to say more than "seems unnotable." Why? See WP:JNN. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:58, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: According to WikiProject:Songs, notability for articles on songs should meet the following...

Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song. Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable.

As far as I can see, this song meets none of these crieria.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 00:07, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Seventh Sojourn. Chrisbrl88 (talk) 12:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, perhaps Merge would be fairer.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 23:12, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.